<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Greenplans News</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rri.org/news/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1</id>
   <updated>2008-08-21T00:19:24Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.31</generator>

<entry>
   <title>EU Climate Change Policy 2009</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/08/eu_climate_change_policy_2009.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.19</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-21T00:18:46Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-21T00:19:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The EU is continuing to work on a global and comprehensive post-2012 agreement to be finalized in Copenhagen in 2009. The EU&apos;s goals are to curb greenhouse gas emissions in all its areas of activity in a bid to achieve...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[The EU is continuing to work on a global and comprehensive post-2012 agreement to be finalized in Copenhagen in 2009.  The EU's goals are to curb greenhouse gas emissions in all its areas of activity in a bid to achieve the following objectives: consuming less-polluting energy more efficiently, creating cleaner and more balanced transport options, making companies more environmentally responsible without compromising their competitiveness, ensuring environmentally friendly land-use planning and agriculture and creating conditions conducive to research and innovation. More information is available at <a href="http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/s15012.htm" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/s15012.htm</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>New Zealand&apos;s Sustainability and Climate Change Plan</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/08/new_zealands_sustainability_an.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.18</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-21T00:18:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-21T00:20:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>New Zealand has been developing a coordinated plan for implementing sustainability in relation to climate change. The Sustainability Package is composed of 6 initiatives: Helping Households towards Sustainability; Business partnerships for sustainability; Eco-verification: demonstrating sustainability of goods and services; Government...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      New Zealand has been developing a coordinated plan for implementing sustainability in relation to climate change. The Sustainability Package is composed of 6 initiatives: Helping Households towards Sustainability; Business partnerships for sustainability; Eco-verification: demonstrating sustainability of goods and services; Government to buy sustainable goods and services; Public service takes lead in becoming carbon neutral ; Towards zero waste.  Work on the six initiatives sits alongside much existing work to promote sustainability, including: The New Zealand Energy Strategy; New Zealand Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy; New Zealand Transport Strategy; New Zealand Waste Strategy; Climate Change action plan.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Mexico City to Cut GHG Emissions 12% by 2012</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/08/mexico_city_to_cut_ghg_emissio.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.17</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-21T00:17:30Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-21T00:18:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Mexico City plans to cut its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 12% by 2012, according to Environmental Secretary Martha Delgado. The capital and the surrounding area emit about 60 million tons of GHG per year. The Climate Action Program of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      Mexico City plans to cut its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 12% by 2012, according to Environmental Secretary Martha Delgado. The capital and the surrounding area emit about 60 million tons of GHG per year. The Climate Action Program of Mexico City 2008-2012 will require investment of around 60 billion pesos (US$5.9 million), half of which the city government will provide, the other half to come from the sale of carbon bonds and other investments. Twenty-six actions will be launched to reduce emissions, including the capture of biogas from the Bordo Poniente landfill, and a program of compulsory public transportation to school. &quot;The Climate Action Program of Mexico City represents an enormous opportunity to contribute and curb global warming. As a city we will reduce emissions by seven million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent...which puts us at the forefront of this issue.&quot; 
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Netherlands&apos; GIDEON Arrives in 2011</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/07/netherlands_gideon_arrives_in.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.16</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-07T20:21:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-07T20:21:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The NL Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (&apos;VROM&apos;) is creating a single, cohesive infrastructure of geographic information (&apos;geo-information&apos;) concerning matters such as road networks, soil structure and environmental quality, relating to almost all major social issues such...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      The NL Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (&apos;VROM&apos;) is creating a single, cohesive infrastructure of geographic information (&apos;geo-information&apos;) concerning matters such as road networks, soil structure and environmental quality, relating to almost all major social issues such as mobility, care, public order, safety and spatial planning. GIDEON is being built in collaboration with other ministries, government bodies, companies and knowledge institutes. This infrastructure will be freely available to all, enabling citizens, companies and institutes to improve development of products and services. In this way, GIDEON will help reduce companies&apos; administrative burden and improve the delivery of government services to citizens. VROM has not opted for a pre-determined blueprint, but chooses to gradually build up the system in order to increase chances of success and close gaps of knowledge and expertise. 
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>EU Agrees to Outlaw &quot;Green Crimes&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/05/eu_agrees_to_outlaw_green_crim.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.15</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-30T19:27:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-30T19:28:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The EU has approved legislation that will force national governments to apply criminal sanctions for deliberate or negligent damage to the environment. The list of crimes includes, inter alia, unlawful discharges or emissions into the air, soil or water so...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      The EU has approved legislation that will force national governments to
apply criminal sanctions for deliberate or negligent damage to the
environment. The list of crimes includes, inter alia, unlawful discharges
or emissions into the air, soil or water so as to cause &quot;substantial
damage&quot; to humans and/or to the environment; waste shipments; killing,
destruction, possession, trading of protected fauna or flora specimens,
except when little or no impact on conservation status; any conduct
causing significant deterioration of habitats within protected sites; and,
production, importation, exportation, placing on the market or use of
ozone-depleting substances. Inciting, aiding, abetting are equally
criminal. Penalties are left to member states&apos; with the proviso that they
be &quot;effective, proportionate and dissuasive&quot;. The law is limited to areas
where the EU has competence, leaving national legislation intact in other
areas.

      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Guidance for New Zealand Resource Management Plans Issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/05/guidance_for_new_zealand_resou.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.14</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-13T02:33:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-13T02:33:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Quality Planning website of New Zealand&apos;s Ministry for the Environment has newly issued Guidance notes on structuring, organizing and writing provisions of regional and district plans under the Resource Management Act. Many plans are at the ten-year stage and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[The Quality Planning website of New Zealand's Ministry for the Environment
has newly issued Guidance notes on structuring, organizing and writing
provisions of regional and district plans under the Resource Management
Act.  Many plans are at the ten-year stage and are coming up for review. 
Additional notes on monitoring and enforcement will be available soon,
also at <http://www.qp.org.nz" target="_blank">www.qp.org.nz</a>. The QP website promotes best practices for
officials, consultants, environmental managers, and others involved in
resource management.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Second New Zealand State of the Environment Issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/05/second_new_zealand_state_of_th.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.13</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-02T21:46:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-02T21:47:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In January 2008 the NZ Ministry for the Environment issued its second state of the environment report, Environment New Zealand 2007, highlighting the impact and significant improvements, as well as continuing work needed, since the RMA was enacted in 1991....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[In January 2008 the NZ Ministry for the Environment issued its second state of the environment report, Environment New Zealand 2007, highlighting the impact and significant improvements, as well as continuing work needed, since the RMA was enacted in 1991. The report uses hard data, reporting on 19 indicators and over 80 specific aspects of resources. All stakeholders welcomed the report as a tool for environmental decision-making. The next report is due in 2012, in addition to regular trend and snapshot updates. The report is available by entering the name of the report in the Search window at <a href="http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications" target="_blank">http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications</a>.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Open Access to Environmental Data Moves Forward</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/04/open_access_to_environmental_d.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.12</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-11T00:34:02Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-23T00:34:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In a parallel to Resource Renewal Institute&apos;s proposed California Environmental Data Platform, the European Commission and Council, promulgated a &quot;Recommendation on the management of intellectual property in knowledge transfer activities and code of Practice for universities and other public research...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      In a parallel to Resource Renewal Institute&apos;s proposed California
Environmental Data Platform, the European Commission and  Council,
promulgated a &quot;Recommendation on the management of intellectual property
in knowledge transfer activities and code of Practice for universities and
other public research organizations.&quot; The purpose is to facilitate
knowledge transfer as a strategic mission by taking steps to encourage
open access to research results while enabling the intellectual property
to be protected in a manner that facilitates cross-border collaborations
in research and development and ensures equitable and fair treatment of
participants. The ultimate goal is the circulation and use of ideas in a
dynamic knowledge society. The EU database will be a model and a resource
for RRI&apos;s CEDP.

      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Going green: White hunter, green heart</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/04/going_green_white_hunter_green.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.11</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-10T22:38:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-10T22:39:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Eco pioneer Huey Johnson still has his guns blazing for the environment Read the full article...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[Eco pioneer Huey Johnson still has his guns blazing for the environment

<a href="http://www.pacificsun.com/story.php?story_id=1854" target="_blank">Read the full article</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>River Warriors Campaign</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2008/02/river_warriors_campaign.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2008:/news//1.10</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-11T17:55:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-11T18:00:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary>February 6, 2008 For Immediate Release &quot;Celebrating Big Achievements of the Little Guys&quot; Three-dozen environmental activists and organizations got a nice surprise in the mail this week. The Water Heritage Trust, an environmental think tank dedicated to preserving water for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[February 6, 2008
For Immediate Release		
			
<strong>"Celebrating Big Achievements of the Little Guys"</strong>
Three-dozen environmental activists and organizations got a nice surprise in the mail this week.  The Water Heritage Trust, an environmental think tank dedicated to preserving water for nature sent $1000 checks to "River Warriors" in the western United States.

Huey Johnson, President and Founder of the Trust said,  "We are celebrating the big achievements of the little guys.  Small successes over decades are the reason that we still have any rivers at all."

Johnson, who has been active in environmental preservation efforts for almost fifty years founded the Trust for Public Land, served as Secretary for Resources for the State of California, and has authored several books on environmental problem solving. He was also the recipient of the UN Sasagawa Environment Prize for his championship of the holistic action approach to environmental problem solving called Green Plans. 

Johnson said, "When one surveys the emergence of a citizen's movement to save water, the best efforts are those of individuals and small organizations that truly love and care for the rivers they're defending."  

Among those groups receiving the micro grants were, Friends of the River, The Smith River Alliance, Mill Valley Stream Keepers, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, Trout Unlimited, The Tuloumne River Trust and Friends of Butte Creek.

"These largely unrecognized groups' expertise and dedication will prove instrumental to improving California and Western states' archaic water practices," said Johnson.

					###
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Perspectives On The Will To Change - Annette Gellert Interview, Chair of RRI&apos;s Board, by The Rex Foundation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2007/11/perspectives_on_the_will_to_ch.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2007:/news//1.9</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-28T23:02:36Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-29T23:32:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The following article is available on-line through the Rex Foundation Publications, www.rexfoundation.org PERSPECTIVES ON THE WILL TO CHANGE, Annette Gellert interview by the Rex Foundation Annette Gellert began working on environmental issues and the Green Plan approach to addressing them...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rri.org">The following article is available on-line through the Rex Foundation Publications, www.rexfoundation.org

PERSPECTIVES ON THE WILL TO CHANGE, Annette Gellert interview by the Rex Foundation

Annette Gellert began working on environmental issues and the Green Plan approach to addressing them some 20 years ago, primarily as a mother concerned for the health of her children.  As she watched her three young children blissfully play in the Bay, and then, with the same hands that handled shells, crabs, dirt and other Bay elements, eat a snack or rub their eyes, she wondered, "Is this water safe?" and "Who is managing the water quality to ensure its safety?"  There was plenty of news about how unsafe the Bay water was, with warnings that pregnant women or people with any health issues should not eat fish from the Bay due to high mercury levels and toxins from marine activities and industry dumping, yet no information about how these problems were being managed to protect public health.

Annette was also troubled by what seemed to be the combative struggle between environmental and industry interests, as well as a compartmentalized approach that addressed pieces of the problem rather than having a more comprehensive, cohesive approach.

Annette's pursuit of a better approach has included learning about how countries like The Netherlands and New Zealand, and now the European Union, have been using Green Plans to dramatically reverse environmental threats and successfully generate both environmentally and economically sound solutions with a process based on collaboration and trust.  Annette wants to see more Green Planning in the U.S. and is exerting her will and energies to make this happen.

Elements Of A Green Plan

The ultimate Green Plan scenario is a process for governance and problem-solving, where at every level - house-hold, community, city, county, region, state and country - there is agreement on the environmental problems to be solved with benchmarks for reduction of toxic emissions and associated shifts in manufacturing methodologies to achieve desired results over a designated period of time, along with a process for monitoring progress and making adjustments as needed.  Essential ingredients to a successful green plan include:

- All involved parties - businesses, government agencies, community-based organizations (CBOs), citizen groups, scientists - are willing participants in the process;
- Agreements/covenants are made in the spirit of trust and cooperation;
- A reasonable timeframe for overall change is established;
- There are measurable benchmarks that everyone in the process knows about and agrees to;
- All participants share a genuine desire to solve the identified problems with solutions that enable businesses to survive while also promoting long-term public health and safety.

A California Green Plan

In 2001, Annette established the Women's Environmental Leadership Network (www.wellnetwork.org) as a vehicle to connect with other women sharing her concerns and desires to effectively create a safe and healthy environment for their children and, of course, all people.  Annette believes WELL helps demonstrate what might be called the "women's approach" to solving problems - coming together, convening, cooperating and seeking consensus-based solutions to problems.  WELL, in conjunction with the Resource Renewal Institute (a 1990 Rex Foundation beneficiary) is working to establish a Green Plan in California.  The optimal steps to accomplish this are:

- Identify industry, community, political and non-profit leaders involved in environmental issues, and have them sit down together;
- Agree on scientific experts/resources of undisputed integrity, whose assumptions will be accepted as the basis for identifying the environmental issues to be addressed, such as agreeing on toxic levels of mercury in the Bay that must be reduced and ultimately eliminated;
- Develop solutions to the agreed upon problem(s) and how each participating entity is involved in implementing the solutions;
- Identify ways to ensure economic as well as social benefits;
- Agree on implementation timeframes that are workable for all participants;
- Agree on benchmarks to monitor progress over time, and the process for carrying out and reporting the monitoring;
- Provide ample opportunities to build trust and cooperation.

The Will To Change

Annette believes that a major paradigm shift is needed for the Green Plan concept to take hold.  "We need to consider our children's health and quality of life first, with our personal interest and financial rewards second, which is the reverse of the current situation.  We must consider how to take care of each other and benefit future generations, not just focus on quarterly profits."

Annette worries that people do not have information that, if fully available and widely dispersed, would produce sufficient outrage and concern to generate the will to change.  For example, she says, "How many people know that more and more babies are born with toxic chemicals in their blood, that breast milk is full of chemicals, that sperm count is down by 25% across the United States over the last 25 years?"

From her own experience and from witnessing the successful implementation of Green Plans in other countries, Annette knows that individuals can exert significant influence to bring about Green Plans in the U.S. and the associated shift in thinking that will support their implementation.  She recommends that individuals find their voices and:

- Write/Fax their legislators, stating that they want to see the Green Plan way take hold in their communities;
- Write to corporations, directing action to implement environmentally sound practices and take leadership roles in establishing Green Plans;
- See what others are doing to successfully solve problems, such as the Resource Renewal Institute and other Rex Foundation beneficiaries;
- Examine their own living situation and find ways to shift to more environmentally healthy behaviors, such as reducing bottled water consumption, or minimizing plastic bag use;
- Exercise their right to vote!  Annette points out that we cannot expect to outspend the interests who want to maintain the status quo; however, we can vote our will to change.

Annette's children are now 18, 21 and 26, yet the questions she raised about the safety of Bay water when they were toddlers are still unanswered.  To that end, she and her WELL colleagues are hard at work to shape a Green Plan for California.  They seek to have connections with young women and men, women's organizations across the country and internationally, an din general, all women and men who share the belief that we must all do something to ensure the health and well-being of our children for generations to come, and that we can, individually and together, make that happen.</a>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>What It Will Take to Build a Sustainable U.S. by Kenny Ausubel</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2007/11/what_it_will_take_to_build_a_s.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2007:/news//1.8</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-26T19:41:51Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-26T20:07:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>What It Will Take to Build a Sustainable U.S. by Kenny Ausubel, November 1, 2007 We must imagine a new way of life in order to avoid the devastating environmental crises that face humanity, argues the visionary founder of the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rri.org">What It Will Take to Build a Sustainable U.S.
by Kenny Ausubel, November 1, 2007

We must imagine a new way of life in order to avoid the devastating environmental crises that face humanity, argues the visionary founder of the Bioneers conference.
The nature of nature is change. Sometimes it hurtles into fast forward, tripping radical shifts. Think of it as nature's regime change. For the first time, people are causing it on a planetary scale.

Andrew Revkin reported in the New York Times that "The physical Earth is increasingly becoming what the human species makes of it. The accelerating and intensifying impact of human activities is visibly altering the planet, requiring ever more frequent redrawing not only of political boundaries, but of the shape of Earth's features themselves."

Mick Ashworth, editor-in-chief of the annual Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World, said his staff of 50 cartographers now updates their databases every three and a half minutes. Commented the editor, "We can literally see environmental disasters unfolding before our eyes."

Environmental disasters are always human disasters. Satellite pictures of Burma over the past three years have recorded the extermination of over 3,000 villages of the indigenous Karen people and nearby tribes, displacing half a million people. The main culprit is the corporate hunger for oil and gas, backed by the murderous local military junta.

Google Earth will leave you google-eyed. An overrun resource base is visibly shrinking at the same time our population keeps growing. Honey, we shrunk the planet.

The bottom line, of course, is we're living beyond our means. Nearly two thirds of the life-support services provided to us by nature are in decline worldwide and the pace is quickening. We can't count on the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations. This is new territory.

The big wheels of ecological governance are turning. Regime change is the actual technical term some ecologists use -- for instance, when the climate flips from one state to another. It can be irreversible, at least on a human time frame. These evolutionary exclamation points unleash powerful forces of destruction and creation, collapse and renewal.

We do have a compass of sorts during these cycles of creative destruction. As Charles Darwin observed, "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change."

Change is not linear, and sudden shifts sometimes remake the world in the blink of an eye. We know we're approaching mysterious thresholds that mark the tipping points of ecological regime change, and we may have already crossed some. The closer we get to each threshold, the less it takes to push the system over the edge, where the degree of damage will be exponentially greater. Societies slide into crisis when slammed by multiple shocks or stressors at the same time. Climate change is propelling both natural and human systems everywhere toward their tipping points.

When huge shocks transform the landscape, structures and institutions crumble, releasing tremendous amounts of bound-up energy and resources for renewal and reorganization. Novelty emerges. These times belong to those who learn, innovate and adapt. Small changes can have big influences. It's a period of creative ferment, freedom and transformation.

Ecological regime change means a radical realignment of the human enterprise with nature's governance. We stand at the threshold of a singular opportunity in the human experiment: to re-imagine how to live on Earth in a good way that lasts.

The name of the game is resilience. It means the capacity of both human and ecological systems to absorb disturbance and still retain their basic function and structure. Resilience does not mean just bouncing back to business-as-usual. It means assuring the very ability to get back. But if regime change happens, resilience means having sufficient capacity to transform to meet the new management.

A network of ecologists and social scientists called the Resilience Alliance outlined some of the rules of the road in their book "Resilience Thinking." The first principle of resilience thinking is systems thinking: It's all connected, from the web of life to human systems. "You can only solve the whole problem," says Huey Johnson of the Resource Renewal Institute. Manage environmental and human systems as one system. Taking care of nature means taking care of people, and taking care of people means taking care of nature. Look for systemic solutions that address multiple problems at once. Watch for seeds of new solutions that emerge with changing conditions.

Resilience thinking means abandoning command-and-control approaches. We're not remotely in control of the big wheels of ecological governance or complex human systems. Greater decentralization can provide backup against the inevitable failure of centralized command-and-control structures. Think decentralized power grids, more localized food systems, and the Internet. Always have a backup. Redundancies are good failsafe mechanisms, not the waste portrayed by industrial efficiency-think.

The heart of resilience is diversity. Damaged ecosystems rebound to health when they have sufficient diversity. So do societies. It's not just a diversity of players; it's the diversity of how they respond to myriad challenges. Each one does it slightly differently with specialized traits that can win the day, depending which curve ball comes at you. Diverse approaches improve the odds. Diverse cultures and ideas enrich society's capacity to survive and thrive.

Ecological governance is also operating on much grander time frames than quarterly reports and mid-term elections. Think dozens, hundreds, even thousands of years. Sustainability means staying in the game for the long haul.

We know some other keys to resilience.

    * Build community and social capital. Resilience resides in enduring relationships and networks that hold cultural memory the same way seeds regenerate a forest after a fire.
    * Empower local communities to solve their own problems. Governance usually works best when it's closest to the ground and includes all stakeholders across all levels.
    * Beware of systems being too tightly connected, because one shock to the system can cause them all to crash at the same time.
    * And above all -- learn, experiment and innovate. 

The one non-negotiable is to face our vulnerabilities clearly and collaboratively. Windows of opportunity are finite and fleeting. As Yogi Berra said, "I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early."

Fortunately the climate is changing in more ways than one. A starburst of creativity is also warming the globe with what ecological designer John Todd calls "human ingenuity wedded to the wisdom of the wild." With any luck, we may be able to avoid catastrophic ecological regime change by embracing societal regime change.

Some of the most inspiring models are the National Green Plans well underway in the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, and Singapore, as well as in the European Union. In the UK, the movement to Transition Towns is weaning whole populations off imported energy, food, and material goods.

The Dutch National Environmental Policy Plan made sustainability and environmental recovery a national goal. Since its inception in 1989, it has achieved a formidable 70 percent of its mission. This new societal regime aligns business with biology and the state with the public good.

The Dutch took the solve-the-whole-problem approach and had strong political leadership. In 1989 Queen Beatrix used her traditional Christmas Eve speech to appeal to the nation. She reported that although the Netherlands had some of the best environmental regulations in the world, scientists were warning her of the real possibility there would be no Dutch great-grandchildren. In a country where a third of the country lies below sea level and holds two thirds of the population, the threat of rising seas from global warming is up close and personal. The Green Queen's speech precipitated a political sea change.

The Dutch mobilized around a bold goal: total environmental quality recovery in 25 years. They welcomed new ideas. They built on the successes of others, saving loads of time and money. They generated rigorous and transparent data unpolluted by special interests. They've made it freely available to the world because no country can do it alone.

But the process really kicked in only after business got on board and took the lead. Fate lent a hand. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, some Eastern European nations were eager to establish a market economy. They asked a few key Dutch business leaders to advise them on how they achieved the excellence of Dutch public education, health, and housing, all within a robust business climate.

Upon arrival, the Dutch business leaders literally could not breathe from the out-of-control pollution left by an unaccountable one-party state. Seeing children condemned to grow up in these bereft conditions vaporized their opposition to independent government regulation.

They returned to Holland with a surprising proposal: Have government set the standards, and let business figure out how to achieve them. While business proved pivotal for the first step in the National Plan, government became the key player. Together they developed a twenty-five-year plan, as well as annual plans that report on progress and challenges. If business fails to meet the specific voluntary goals, government will intervene with mandatory controls. To guarantee transparency and accountability, the government funded environmental NGOs as watchdogs to transmit their findings to the media and the public.

The European Union, representing 490 million citizens in 27 nations, has begun to adopt many of the same approaches.

"What planet are we on?" you might wonder from here in the Wild West of Western civilization. Isn't it time for a U.S. Green Plan? We have a golden opportunity to regenerate our waning economy at the same time we seriously correct environmental degradation and rampant social injustices. We are a brittle superpower bedeviled by an aging infrastructure so decrepit the American Society of Civil Engineers gives it a pitiable grade of D. We're ill prepared to deal with disasters, especially the natural and industrial disasters that present far greater threats to the nation than terrorism. Our declining public health and educational systems rank among the lowest in developed countries. Real wages are at a 59-year low and corporate profits at an all-time high. Extremes of wealth and poverty rival the Gilded Age of the robber barons, while the military economy is fast bankrupting our future.

The reinvention of a green economy can begin to solve our bundle of economic and social ills simultaneously. We can create abundant jobs, prosperity, equity and hope. Our new declaration of independence is from fossil fuels and imperial entanglements. We can make the urgent transition to renewable energy at the same time we renew the higher angels of what it means to be an American.

In fact, the seeds are sprouting everywhere. In the absence of federal leadership, large numbers of cities and states are banding together to lead exactly these kinds of changes. It's a meta-trend called the "New Localism." Political power is decentralizing to effectively address bioregional realities of people and place.

Political boundaries are also morphing. A historic convergence of the environmental and social justice movements is crystallizing in the shared recognition that taking care of nature means taking care of people, and taking care of people means taking care of nature. The environmental community is increasingly embracing social justice as central to the mission. Indigenous communities, our old-growth cultures, are providing visionary leadership as guardians of the Original Instructions for how to live in peace with the land and each other. Leaders in the African-American community, including pathfinders such as Van Jones, Majora Carter and Omar Freilla, are organizing around a green economy founded in green-collar justice and the relief of poverty and racial inequality. In 2006, the Latino National Congress put environment at the top of its national political agenda.

Meanwhile, there are mounting numbers of green conservatives, a.k.a. "Crunchy Cons," stepping up under the banner of conserving the Earth for their grandchildren. Evangelical Christians are calling for Creation Care. Networks of networks are getting connected, collaborating and innovating across divides to solve the whole problem. This is resilience in action.

As David Orr puts it, "Hope is a verb with its sleeves rolled up. Hopeful people are actively engaged in defying the odds or changing the odds."

The odds are especially tough here in the U.S. We need to reclaim our government from the corporate shadow government. It will keep trying to hijack systemic changes that threaten its short-term profits, vested interests and power. There'll be enough green corporate spin to knock the Earth off its axis. We need to reject the role of consumers in a "Democracy Theme Park," as Jane Anne Morris calls it, in favor of exercising our political muscle as active citizens. Simply put, we need the separation of corporations and the state.

We need to attend relentlessly to the deep wounds of racism that continue to poison our society and divide us. As John Mohawk wrote, the history of racism is inextricably tied to class war: the history of civilization as "organized violence in pursuit of plunder." The only Gulf War we need to wage is to end the gulf between rich and poor.

A successful U.S. Green Plan depends on our doing all this -- together, with respect, justice and dignity for all people and the circle of life.

The Mayan people call this epic threshold the "Time of No Time." Ohki Simine Forest, a Canadian wisdom keeper of Mohawk descent who lives and works with the Mayan people in Chiapas, describes the Mayan vision in this way. From here on, we're on Earth time. Mother Earth is shaking to her core. It's a time of madness, disconnection and hyper-individualism. It's also a time when new energies are coming into the world, when people are growing a new skin.

The Mayan vision says that we in the West will find safe harbor only if we can journey past a wall of mirrors. The mirrors will surely drive us mad -- unless we have a strong heart. Some mirrors delude us with an infinity of reflections of our vanity and shadows. Others paralyze us with our terror and rage, feeding an empire that manufactures our fear into resignation.

But the empire has no roots and it's toppling all around us. In this time everyone is called to take a stand. Everyone is called to be a leader.

To get beyond the wall of mirrors, the final challenge is to pass through a tiny door. To do this, we must make ourselves very, very small. To be humble. Then we must burrow down into the Earth, where indigeneity lives. On the other side is a clear pond. There, for the first time, we'll be able to see our true reflection.

In this Time of No Time, we can go in any direction we want -- by dreaming it. Our dreaming can shift the course of the world.

That's our deepest well of resilience.

That's what we're here to do together as bioneers: re-imagine the world. It's going to be a long and winding trek across generations. We're already making some of the paths others can walk toward the dream, toward our many dreams. Countless more dreamers will blaze luminous new trails. The dreams are already within us. One day we may awaken to find ourselves living in our wildest dreams.

May it be so.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A Lecture by Huey Johnson on Going Green: A Strategy for Economic Prosperity</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2007/04/a_lecture_by_huey_johnson_on_g.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2007:/news//1.7</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-13T23:51:04Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-30T03:48:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Going Green: A Strategy for Economic Prosperity A Lecture Given by Huey D. Johnson March 19, 2007 In East Lansing, Michigan My topic is The Green Path for Economic Prosperity . I call it the Green Plan Path, which I...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[Going Green: A Strategy for Economic Prosperity 
A Lecture Given by Huey D. Johnson
March 19, 2007
In East Lansing, Michigan

My topic is The Green Path for Economic Prosperity . I call it the Green Plan Path, which I see as the doorway to the future. It is relatively new but established, well documented, and working for nations. I see it as the most advanced success in environmental management in human history. It is the Green Plan national policy of the Netherlands, New Zealand and Singapore. Recently, much of it has been adopted by the twenty-seven nation European Union (EU).  An objective of this lecture is to make the case that the current US opposition to planning and comprehensive management is misdirected.  At the end of this lecture I will describe why I think the US has little choice, and will become a Green Plan nation.

An in-depth look at the Green Plan Path to a healthy, well managed and economically productive environment is beyond the scope of one night's lecture. Rather than going into detail about the many different areas it encompasses, I suggest you look at the home page on our website, www.rri.org.*   

The Dutch program has been specifically documented so that any other states or nations interested in adopting green plans have free access to the information concerning their efforts. They have fiercely defended the integrity of their data against intrusion by special interest influence, so it is trusted by all sectors, and this element of integrity has been essential to their success. The seriousness of their effort is related to the fact that one-third of their nation is below sea level, and if sea levels rise beyond the capacity of their levees, the Dutch could lose a good portion of their nation. Another comprehensive source of information is the book I wrote called Green Plans: a Path to Sustainability, coming out this year in its third edition.

The three nations [the Netherlands, New Zealand and Singapore] utilizing this comprehensive, integrated, and systemic method of management all share similarities. I view their efforts of environmental recovery as a broad, solve-the-whole-problem approach. Other states, nations, and currently the United States, use the method of undertaking one segment at a time: forest policy this year, chemical policy next year, water policy the next year, energy policy the year after etc. Unfortunately those previously solved policy parts start to unravel before they become part of a manageable whole.

Another similarity between these Green Plan nations is that the political leader from each of them independently advanced the idea. I will tell of one, which involves the Dutch Queen Beatrix. Once a year she is free to give a speech not prepared by the government bureaucracy, which is widely broadcast on Christmas Eve. In 1988 she spoke saying, Dear citizens, this year I am setting aside my prepared comments to share a difficulty we face... The Dutch scientific community had recently concluded in a paper given to her, that even though the Netherlands had some of the best environmental regulations in the world, it was not good enough - there was a real possibility that there would be no Dutch great-grandchildren. She appealed to the country, saying it was possible for them to rise to the challenge, improve their environmental problems, and set an example for the world. It was hardly a cheery Christmas message; however, it worked, and she is now known as the Green Queen. 

The Dutch began with the term "back casting" used in business management. This is one lesson, amid many, that we can learn from them. The Dutch first decided they wanted to achieve total environmental quality recovery in 25 years. They worked back from their idea of complete environmental recovery to the present issues at hand. For example, imagine building the first computer. Imagine how those computer pioneers first needed to have a picture of the result in mind while they were building the machine. The Dutch similarly created a Green Plan which first set overall environmental goals to achieve their picture of complete environmental recovery. 

PRINCIPLES TO HELP BUILD A GREEN PLAN 

The Green Plan Path requires an imaginary vehicle to carry us along the Green Path to our goal - the topic of my lecture tonight. We can build it in our minds. I will now outline some necessary principles to build this vehicle for a similar Green Plan program to work in Michigan or, congruently, to work in any state. These principles have been taken from the successful experiences of nations already prospering from using a Green Plan.

Principle One:  We can only solve the entire problem. 

The concept of managing the whole of something is not new. Three hundred years ago a poet named Thomas Trahearne said, "The more we live in all, the more we live in one". My vehicle needs wheels, a body, an engine, and the usual parts; however, only building the finest wheel will not get us anywhere, nor will building any one perfect part. The goal is to build the whole vehicle. This may be a difficult lesson for technologists to accept. Somehow the technique of our thinking and learning methods have been to reduce information into parts while not bothering with the meaning of the goal, which in this case is the whole machine. 

Oversimplicity is especially relevant to the current national awakening of the threat of Global Warming *. The first policy efforts are oversimplified, economically driven answers.  Cap and Trade is a good example of an oversimplified economically driven policy; it is a tool amid many actions that need to be taken, it is not the only tool.

In managing the quality of citizens' lives, the whole ecosystem is the most important dimension. All the resource issues of the state have to be managed at the same time: water, fisheries, soil policy, energy, transportation, tax policy, quality of life issues, etc. Any one issue affects all other issues. Natural systems provide the cheapest and most energy efficient track. The quality of sunlight, water, crops, forests and natural systems shape the reality of the quality of our lives. All of these issues together require management. I repeat-herding all of these issues and policies through time requires the key word: management. Scientific or economic emphasis will not be sufficient any more than only one wheel will move us; it requires a comprehensive approach in order to work. The conditions of a free society are complex; everything is connected with everything else. We can only solve the whole problem, and this is possible with comprehensive management.

Pollution is an example of one issue affecting other issues. The coal burning company polluting a community will argue that its presence is necessary in order to provide a profit, that jobs are everything. I disagree; quality of life is the underlying issue. Consider the health costs of lung ailments from the polluted air, such as children's asthma; or the affects of mercury on children's intelligence, in addition to the stunted growth of forests and crops, and the damaged lake fisheries due to acidification. Include the CO2 additions and we need to seriously reconsider the use of coal. This issue is so serious that a recent United Nations scientific study recommended there should not be any more coal plants built in the world. Moving a company to Kentucky will not escape certain coming changes in laws that will limit coal as an energy source.

Why do we need to take a comprehensive approach to problem solving?  The US needs to understand that the necessary task is to manage the complexity because at this time we have the habit of approaching one policy at a time. A mantra of economics, jobs, and profits is not sufficient anymore. Resource management is complex because everything is connected; each issue affects all other issues. The Green Plan Path is about managing the complexity to deliver the future. 

Principle Two:  Be open to new ideas - use the success of others and build on those in order to help your present needs; this is cheaper and faster. 

Others have already built the vehicle carrying us. We do not need to reinvent the wheel. Further, there is a mass of very capable people in the world already working to determine a better way of maintaining the quality of life. They are pursuing concepts that will bring as much change as the Lindbergh flight that launched the age of airplanes.

The new tool of trade is electronic communication. Inventions and ideas, data on endless experiments already tried, and the accumulation of recorded information in history is instantly available to us. The most important task now is to seek and apply some of those ideas that can work in your region. The world's interesting ideas and concepts are being shared and they include a huge fiscal savings. There are many successful examples to ease the challenge of embarking on a new comprehensive management strategy.

The whole world is involved in working toward improvement, and that is a new motivation factor for us to do the same. The Dutch are among the most progressive in managing environmental problems. They have a special reason to see us improve on our environmental management, for if sea levels rise, their levees are threatened. They want everyone in the world to use better conservation management strategies, which makes their websites especially relevant. Their data is trustworthy, and there are countless Dutch studies and programs on their websites. Millions of dollars and thousands of hours were contributed to assemble the basic information needed to ease decision-making in the future; it is an example of costs and logic. If you are planning to build a house and need to buy window frames, they have a site comparing the cost of wood, metal and plastic, and that cost includes not only currency, but also resources used and energy expended. It encompasses a synthesis of ideas, which can guide us toward survival.
 
Here is an example of how tracking new information relates to Michigan. In anticipation of this visit I asked Michigan experts about a few issues, including energy resource issues, one of which was solar energy. I was told that solar power is not a possibility here; there are too many cloudy days. I checked cloudy days on the Internet and according to the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Lansing, Michigan averages 191 cloudy days per year. Germany, by comparison, has 230 cloudy days per year. Then I checked with Dr. Hermann Scheer, a member of the German Parliament, who is viewed as Germany's solar energy expert. He stated that Germany would create 50,000 new jobs in the solar industry in Germany within the next six years. Germany will then continue to expand its solar effort to the point of being independent of carbon energy sources. On a side note, Dr. Scheer defines anything involving carbon for energy to be a poison source, and he includes nuclear energy in this observation. Germans are choosing not to use poison carbon sources for their energy needs because paying a bit more to have a clean source and healthy kids as a result is sensible to the public.

There is a hint here of a long-standing problem in this great state of Michigan, the attitude that, "if it's not invented here then it doesn't work". There are 101 developing technologies that can be tracked and researched. Wind turbines can give you electrical power; but it's not the whole answer because when the wind quits utilities must have total backup equipment - that currently means using carbon or nuclear sources.  At the moment storage batteries are too expensive to be useful on that scale. 

However, I'll wager someone currently working on the problem will discover a better way, and when they do, that is an industry that you should go after.  Here is a hint.   Air compressors pressured by wind turbines can store compressed air in old gas or salt wells.  The compressed air becomes pressurized energy to be used during quiet wind periods to run clean surface generators. A small start up company in Boston is raising funds to launch that compressed air storage concept.  Don't forget heat exchangers as another option; and water is also a good source of energy.

Although we are behind now, the US is going to move to a green path. We will have all of the studies and tested programs available from Green Plan nations to help give us a jump-start. The exciting news is that large numbers of US corporations have turned green, and this opens the door to new possibilities.

Principal Three:  Business Leadership is essential to carry the idea. 

In the success models I have most studied (Holland, Singapore, New Zealand, and the European Union), environmental progress was stuck, as they currently are here in the US, until business stepped forward and took the lead. This will be true here as well. At first I assumed it had been the voice of government or the non-profit activist sector that mustered enough energy to advance the sustainable idea. However, I made a number of trips to those nations in order to investigate their processes of switching to all-encompassing integrated policies. I concluded from those trips that changing the scale to comprehensive management is so complex it requires the leadership of the most powerful institutions, in this case what has consistently been the usual opposition to government - business. 

Part of the reason for the EU's environmental success is from business joining their cause. Anytime you have been locked in opposition with a strong opponent, as environmental advocates have been locked, and the opponent suddenly joins you, you move forward in huge leaps. The reality is that business has attained tremendous influence in government and public affairs. Elected government officials have to compromise to such a degree that environmental legislation most often does not make it or is hardly recognizable after business interests have compromised it. In Europe business leaders took the first step by sharing their conclusions and proposing the idea that environmental concerns were real. This was a dimension required to solve some of their long-term problems, including differences between sectors of business and their traditional enemies. 

For instance, when I spoke to the New Zealand Business Round Table in Wellington, the chairperson, upon introducing me, asked if I had noticed the absence of real estate development interests in the room. They opposed our decision to support a national comprehensive green plan, he said. They did not like the word "planning". So we kicked them out of the round table. In Holland, business and agriculture divided regarding the decision of whether or not business should go to the government to suggest a Green Plan. For fear of being run out of town I will not recommend that a similar break will be needed in order to move any Michigan legislation past the auto industry domination of the legislature. However, the EXXON factor that hoodwinked the Big Three so big gas users assured them of record profits, then ignored the affect on automakers. Now while EXXON makes historical profits, the automakers and Michigan are wilting; of course, the President of General Motors is still making a fine salary, regardless. One would think that EXXON would at least give the auto industry half of their profits for sticking with big gas hogs and losing any hope of marketable competition with the gas-saving foreign carmakers. In summary, we are on the edge of the major change that swept Europe forward. 

Principle Four:  Though business is crucial for the first step, government is the key player; it is a positive dimension that needs to be involved. 

In recent years government has suffered a down rating in US voter relevance. A challenge we have in the US is to re-build confidence in government. 

Here is an important example of the role of government. The world's two leading solar powers are Germany and California. In part, both are successful because their respective governments gave them advantages of tax credits and capital in order to fuel their research and experiments. Another example is Eastern Europe at the time they were newly freed from the control of the Soviet Union. What, they asked, should we do?  They wanted to establish a free market system with a free market economy. But how could they do it?  Ah, lets bring in some foreign business leaders to give us advice. But who shall it be?  The US?  No. Not Germany or Australia. The Dutch were selected; they had excellent public education, health, housing, and they seemed to have a fine business climate. 

The invitation went out and soon a jet load of executives from the Netherlands landed in Eastern Europe. However, those Dutch business leaders were stunned by what they saw. The Soviets had left the place terribly polluted; they could hardly breath. The water pollution was shocking, and watching the children trying to live in these conditions was too much to bear. They decided to go back home, and when they returned to the Netherlands, these business leaders had an honest review of what they'd learned. They had thought that economic policy free of government regulations was what they wanted. Yet, the disastrous downside was obvious from their trip, and they realized they had to move beyond that possibility, but how?  

These business leaders from the Netherlands decided on the most radical action, to go to government and say, let's work out this environmental problem cooperatively. You know what standards we should have, and we know better than you how to achieve it. And so they did. Business was given the chance to do its part voluntarily; they had a twenty-five year plan, and an annual plan that required a report on the progress and challenges. The program was not without standards; it was clearly understood that if business did not succeed in the voluntary format, government would easily go back to command and control.

Principle Five:  Lead from Strength. 

Michigan has unique strong qualities. While you can't grow pineapples - a huge strength you do have is the abundance of water. I was recently in Arizona and noted the local press was grumbling about Intel Corporation. The large computer chip manufacturer was buying the water rights of small farmers in the region so that they could expand in the future. Maybe that will work, but whoever chooses sites for the factories in the firm should read The Milagro Bean Field War, by John Nichols. The social and political issues presented in the book parallel some sociology and politics primed to obstruct Intel's road to the future.

Water is an example of a systemic problem also. The energy required to run electric water pumps consumes one-third of California's daily electrical energy production. We send water 600 miles from the North to Los Angeles in the South, including pumping it over a mountain range. Michigan has an abundance of water, and if I were building a plant I would go where there is an abundance of water already. I encourage you to lead from this strength, and encourage businesses to see the benefits of moving their established practices to Michigan.

There are hundreds of entrepreneurs who believe they have comprehensive concepts that will solve the environmental crisis and win the future. Places like San Francisco and Boston already have many large groups currently working to produce these innovative ideas. If I were you, I would not challenge their development of ideas. What you and those groups both need, are manufacturing facilities. Unfortunately, many of the people who develop those ideas live in popular places like Silicon Valley, and flee the area just on the basis of housing costs. This seems to be a contradiction; but focusing on one or several environmental themes while ignoring the rest will bite you sooner or later. However, sometimes problems can be assets. A recent article in the press reported that while California had previously ranked fourth in the Gross Domestic Product rating of states, through the last decade it is slipping economically and is now described as suffering a reverse migration. California now ranks seventeenth. One of two reasons given is that the cost of housing is too high for any worker to own a home who has an average salary . I understand that housing prices here are but a fraction of the cost in California.

Principle Six:  Upgrade and maintain the quality of life here.

The majority of states have a welcome mat out for new industries and there is plenty of competition. Every governor hopes that their state will bring in new industries and jobs. That decision requires the evaluation of living conditions as a measurement of the quality of life. Today, in order to succeed in industry, it is necessary to appeal to the quality of life. Your actions concerning the states' ethics, assets and values determine a future company's factory site evaluation. I will give you some hints for what to consider as Michigan's assets: water and wild land recreation. By comparison, California and the American west are arid. When it doesn't rain in California for a few months, I recall how nice it was growing up in Michigan, and being able to swim and fish in real lakes and hear thunder from summer rains. And I miss the winter sports I love: ice fishing, ice-skating, cross-country skiing and other cold weather sports. Take advantage of the opportunities you have here. Advertise a sense of place, a shared feeling for the place and a willingness to sacrifice for it. 

Hunting is another "sport" that appeals to a lot of people here and elsewhere. For many of us, the growing health issues in the food industry conceptually justify the return to hunting. As an example of new opportunity, I note that a number of urban states now provide an urban hunting license, allowing people to hunt deer by archery inside city boundaries. The sheer number of auto accidents with deer, in addition to the problem of Lyme disease (of which deer are carriers), justified their decision to allow hunting within the city. 

An improvement category that is necessary for Michigan is land use policy. I say this without clearing permission with my host for the evening, the Land Policy Institute. From an outside perspective, we hear that in Michigan it is possible for hospitals to be built next to pig farms, or for public parks to be sold for private development; and we think that is barbaric. A change in that attitude (and policies) would improve the image of Michigan. There are plenty of examples in the world and in other countries from which to draw new ideas and experiences. For instance, you could look at zoning works as shown by New Zealand's land policy (link). Such a progressive land policy includes imaginative architecture, landscaping, zoning, and the separation of development rights and scenic easements from the ownership of the surface itself, requiring innovation in taxation . These are all areas that would set a tone of new quality for the state. Regarding the haphazard sale of parklands for any purpose, something your [Michigan] legislature seems determined to do, I borrow a phrase from David Brower, "The world is not rich enough to lose any more of the gentle wilderness, nor poor enough that we need to."  Acquiring money from the sale of parks is not worth the damage to the image of integrity as seen from the outside.

Lead from strength. You have water, you have low cost housing, and you have adequate appealing qualities that could entice the technical specialists needed to carry out programs for the future. You have successfully overcome bad times before. I remember reading in some past sociology class that during the horrors of New York's Hell's kitchen period, the cut over timber areas of Michigan were equally tragic, but still overcome.

There are additional factors that could be principles in my view, and I will mention them briefly. 

Time - plan for the evolution of the Green Plan theme to evolve over several years. Both the New Zealand and Dutch examples took about five years from the beginning to become the functioning national programs they are today; and they are still evolving, sixteen and eighteen years into their plans. Part of the reason it took years was the time it took to sell the idea to the opposition and cynics. When we join these nations in a green plan effort we can expect a shorter timeframe because the evidence, the hard statistics of the advantages of Green Plans already available, will move us quickly ahead. 

Green Taxes - have a proven track record and should be applied here. A green tax on fuels would guarantee that all Americans would be involved in the sacrifice to create and maintain a sustainable environment and environmental policy. Make those who are opposed fight the whole population of America. The Dutch get 12% of their present tax revenue from green taxes, using the concept that the polluter pays.

Social Contract - get everyone involved. When industry, government, labor and environmentalists supported the new direction, The Netherlands had a new basis for governance and began the process of change for the better. They understood the need to be comprehensive and involve the whole country in a social contract. Enthusiasm was stirred by education. Considerable TV campaigning was done and the whole country was soon involved. Industry especially applied its skills in advertising, which helped develop public support.

Health - is the new force. It is clean versus poison, and carbon sources are described as poison. Since they are often cheaper, some argue that being economical is a priority. However, if you include the health costs, the epidemic of children's asthma, cancers, loss of crops and forests, rising seas and the flooding that entails, you have a different set of statistics.

The Dutch use this term as one of the sub-categories describing their Green Plan. They appealed to their nation at all levels to take on the problem of environmental health decline and solve it. They worked to convince many institutions to join them and had a major victory when the labor sector became involved. 

Integrity of Information - is critical. It is one of the principal reasons the Dutch plan worked. A trusted scientific institute oversees and constantly evaluates the Dutch programs; it is a referee when there are differences in the meaning of data. This scientific institute is funded by government but remains independent of government influence and the annual report is the blue ribbon document of integrity. The information content on their website is detailed, lengthy and trustworthy.

The Third Player - a third player besides government and industry are the environmental movement critics. From the beginning business and government decided that they would not invite the environmentalists to sit in on their closed-door negotiations. They realized the environmentalists were the trusted judges and communicators in Holland and their independent critique of whatever advances the two negotiators decided on would be essential to political support. As a result, the environmental movement receives some funding from government just so they can maintain economic energy to act as a critic. As independent voices they constantly and accurately transmit their findings to the media.

Here is an important point, one where Michigan State University could help itself and the nation:  Launch an Extension Sustainability Service/Green Plan Community Assistance Program. MSU was the nation's first Land Grant School implemented by The Morrill Act and signed by President Lincoln. As a result, each state with a land grant school has an Extension Service. At the time, The Extension Service brought farmers out of the dark ages of serfdom and into modern society. I recall in some ancient lecture during my student days, that The Extension Service was one of history's foremost successes in dealing with an immense human problem. For Michigan, it would be wonderful if a well-funded Extension Sustainability Service were launched. There are better and cheaper ways to maintain the quality of our lives. Some areas of the country are complacent or so rooted in tradition that they will avoid change for as long as possible. The choice isn't whether we want to move into this contemporary new style of managing our environment. We have little choice. 

Now I will describe why the US has little choice but to adopt a Green Plan, and manage the whole problem in an integrated manner.

I believe the Green Plan model will be adopted by the US for several reasons. The principle reason is that the rest of the world is responding to The EU's Green Plan requirements. As to the EXXON era, others such as Shell Oil, have already begun to modernize, and are now choosing to be called "energy companies" as opposed to "oil companies" and Shell has quickly become one of the worlds' largest solar energy technology manufacturers.

While the EXXON era has caused the US to fall way behind in environmental regulations, much of the rest of the world understands the necessity of competition in the world market. Growing numbers of countries continue to require clean environmental products and will not allow contaminated products into their national trading markets. The US is already under pressure because the now larger, 490 million consumer EU market requires all imports to meet their standards. The US will find that the best option will be to correspond with the requirements of other nations in order to maintain our role in world trade and to improve the health and well being of our citizens. 

The first stroke of this environmental hammer occurred in 1989 when the EU banned the US from exporting beef to Europe. The reason for this ban was to discontinue the import of steers injected with large amounts of growth hormones to Europe. The EU has recently passed regulations limiting the import of other pollutants as well, which has caused some companies in Silicon Valley to recall exported computer products and other electronic equipment to Europe. In addition, the European Commission recently passed a new chemical restriction policy called REACH. This policy will limit 30,000 chemicals from entering Europe, some of which have not been proven to be harmless to consumers. They are also looking to limit air pollution produced by airplanes. They also intend to pass a law applying criminal penalties to corporations in violation of environmental regulations, and the executives who run these corporations could receive jail terms. The EU supports applying regulations consistently and across the board without favoring any one country, person, or organization. To show that they are serious, the EU is pressuring Holland, the country that provided the basis of structure and information for their current environmental policies, to improve their CO2 emissions.

The reason the US has opposed new regulations is due to current free market political dominance. These opponents use the US Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) to guide their efforts. In recent years, such conservative lobby efforts have generally limited US improvement in environmental standards; however, its attempts to force its methods on the EU have failed.

The Chamber has large offices in Belgium, home of the EU, and President Bush appointed an attorney friendly to the Chambers' position as ambassador. When I was last in Belgium, a respected member of the EU laughed at the pressure the Chamber attempted to place on the EU. He said we are not going to listen to their plea against restrictions. They have chosen to forge ahead regardless of the complaints from the usually successful and tough Chamber. Recently, the frustrated president of the Chamber was quoted as saying "...We're going to sue the hell out of them for some of this stuff," which brought hearty laughter from the EU policy makers.

The Chamber's belief in few rules has its problems. A classic example in case is Michigan. A few years ago, both the auto and oil industry blocked the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAF&Eacute;) standards in order to set higher automobile mileage standards favoring their profitable interests. If the CAFE standards had become law at that time, I believe the US auto industry would still be booming ahead of Japanese car manufacturers. However, last week the Big Three appeared again before congress, complaining that they still did not want CAFE standards. This causes cynics to see EXXON as the strong arm reaching out to keep the big gas burners coming. Michigan fuel users spend $18 billion a year in purchases, which continues to pave the streets of Houston in gold.  Detroit, it may be noted, is in such bad shape that there are fifty thousand abandoned houses. One can at least say the automakers misread the market.

The problem can be described as social, political, and environmental progress coming to us the hard way. In fact, the US is dragging its heels as it is pulled into the environmental quality management standards that world trade requires. While the Green Plan concepts of science and technology are documented and available for free on the Internet, the US ignores them. Again, that will change.

I'm optimistic after my visit here; there is a spirit of optimism that the worst is over and that the state can get on with building a better future. I noted today that Lansing's Mayor Bernaro has announced a Green Lansing Program and has signed the growing list of mayors agreeing to help global warming. He deserves a round of cheers for his leadership. It marks one of the turning points that will bring Michigan to a positive future. 

As a former resident who was treated well while growing up here, I will be a gentle critic of the Big Three. I feel an allegiance to General Motors; I was able to pay for my education by working in their factories here. If I had any say in state policy, I would apply tough love, and that would include some increased green gas taxes. In addition, an enlightened labor movement worked in Europe; I assume it would work here too. 

I see a major lesson for the nation from what has happened here.  Having a one-industry economy, without the public sharing in the profits to build infrastructure, is high-risk business. A one-industry state has locked into a legislature so it looks after the Big Three. The problem here is that every indicator imaginable says big gas burners are over. I was on the Cabinet of a California Governor who decreed that Chrysler's largest car could not be sold in the state due to its fuel consumption; currently, the California administration awaits word from the Supreme Court as to whether a state can apply stronger CO2 restrictions than the existing federal restrictions. The Federal EPA said a state can't have stronger regulations, but it is being challenged. If it goes California's way, look out, the hammer is coming down on Hummers.

A point of interest, amid the coming EU restrictions, is a serious vehicle mileage requirement that will affect car manufacturers.

Finally, this path and journey that I believe so much in, is still easy to join, and much of the pioneering work for blazing the path has been done. Whether benefiting from the hundreds of millions of dollars of research, or the proven advantages and the pitfalls, the time won't get any better.

For the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Singapore, the Green Plan Path to prosperity took five years to get underway.  Part of that time was in convincing opposing interests to participate.  They have the information for us on how to make this process work in the US, and bringing their expertise here is an attempt and an opportunity to save time. We have a remarkable scientific and technical dimension indexed in the Resource Renewal Institute's website designed for anyone to reference.

If you have any more political or social questions please email me and I will be happy to answer them. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>UN Concludes Human Activities Cause of Global Warming</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2007/02/un_concludes_human_activities.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2007:/news//1.6</id>
   
   <published>2007-02-16T00:56:48Z</published>
   <updated>2007-02-16T01:06:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published a statement on February 2, 2007 that &quot;most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rri.org">The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published a statement on February 2, 2007 that "most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations."  The IPCC is an authoritative body of 2,500 scientists from more than 130 countries, and "Very likely" amounts to a probability of more than 90% in UN jargon.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>EU Approves Sweeping Chemical Curbs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rri.org/news/2007/01/eu_approves_sweeping_chemical.html" />
   <id>tag:www.rri.org,2007:/news//1.5</id>
   
   <published>2007-01-30T19:55:03Z</published>
   <updated>2007-01-30T21:35:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In December 2006 the European Union greatly expanded its campaign against industrial pollutants with the EU Parliament, Council and Commission approving sweeping restrictions on chemicals with new regulations coming into effect in June 2007. The new law, called REACH for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rri.org/news/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rri.org">In December 2006 the European Union greatly expanded its campaign against industrial pollutants with the EU Parliament, Council and Commission approving sweeping restrictions on chemicals with new regulations coming into effect in June 2007.  The new law, called REACH for the regulation, evaluation, and authorization of chemicals, provides health and safety data for approximately 30,000 chemicals currently used in everyday products.  Most of these chemicals have never before been tested for safety and duplication of tests performed on animals will be prohibited.  REACH is seen as a positive step with the most dangerous substances being gradually replaced, it offers better protection for people and the environment, and places the responsibility with the manufacturer to provide information about chemical substances.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
